| Memo to McCain: Pork Doesn't Come From Grizzlies |
|
|
| Written by Samantha Hulkower | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 20 February 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Look, we like the fact that presumptive GOP nominee John McCain is an opponent of pork projects in the Senate, and as one of five senators not to include any earmarks in bills least year, he can actually walk the walk. But McCain really needs to cut back on the grizzly bear rhetoric. In an effort to brandish his fiscal conservancy, McCain has taken to the airwaves to let Americans know that he is serious about cutting frivolous government spending. In a new campaign ad, he promises that when president, he won't allow your tax dollars to be spent on wasteful projects. He lists several infamous federal misappropriations, such as the 'Bridge to Nowhere' in Alaska, Hillary Clinton's million dollar earmark for a Woodstock Museum, and, of course, a project to study the DNA of grizzly bears. McCain uses the example at many of his events, always with the same joke: "I don't know if it was a paternity issue or criminal, but it was a waste of money." Congress has allocated a total of $4.8 million to be spent on grizzly research. Projects being performed include a US Geological Survey project to capture grizzlies' hair, so that the samples can be used to establish a DNA fingerprint of the animals, and scientists can better track the animals left in the wild. With only 3 percent of the animal's historic population left in the lower 48 states, these bears need all the help they can get. Not surprisingly, scientists who study the bears are irked with the rhetoric. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.12 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Yeah, OK, we can be the change that we want to see in the world. But unless powerful people in powerful positions want to be that change as well, nothing's going to change.
So now, finally, there's a place where you can go for news and analysis of politics from an environmental perspective.